From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] eal: add function to return number of
	detected sockets
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 13:20:12 +0100
Message-ID: <2134391.uA7JBUhxlf@xps>
References: <3f9df1ca17e97b2df560d5af5fa31a778af3263f.1513942728.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
 <7548056.EcYGU9teXu@xps> <6a6fd300-2523-f50a-3be4-461724a70fe0@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4966212001
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 13:20:45 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <6a6fd300-2523-f50a-3be4-461724a70fe0@intel.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

16/01/2018 12:56, Burakov, Anatoly:
> On 12-Jan-18 11:50 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 12/01/2018 12:44, Burakov, Anatoly:
> >> On 11-Jan-18 10:20 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >>> 22/12/2017 13:41, Anatoly Burakov:
> >>>> During lcore scan, find maximum socket ID and store it.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_eal.h
> >>>> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_eal.h
> >>>> @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ enum rte_proc_type_t {
> >>>>    struct rte_config {
> >>>>    	uint32_t master_lcore;       /**< Id of the master lcore */
> >>>>    	uint32_t lcore_count;        /**< Number of available logical cores. */
> >>>> +	uint32_t numa_node_count;    /**< Number of detected NUMA nodes. */
> >>>>    	uint32_t service_lcore_count;/**< Number of available service cores. */
> >>>>    	enum rte_lcore_role_t lcore_role[RTE_MAX_LCORE]; /**< State of cores. */
> >>>
> >>> isn't it breaking the ABI?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> Yep, you're right, forgot to add that. I didn't expect this to get
> >> merged in 18.02 anyway, so v2 will follow.
> > 
> > Please write 18.05 in the subject to show your expectation.
> > Thanks
> > 
> 
> Does it have to be an ABI change though? We can put numa_node_count 
> after pointer to mem_config, in which case it won't be an ABI break. 
> Would that be better?

Changing the size of a struct which is allocated by the app,
is an ABI break.
Is your solution changing the size?