From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: announce ABI change for struct
	rte_eth_tunnel_flow
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 16:03:46 +0100
Message-ID: <2136605.pcfb1tFB10@xps13>
References: <1449639461-9718-1-git-send-email-jijiang.liu@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: Jijiang Liu <jijiang.liu@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com (mail-wm0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EE6F37B2
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 16:11:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: by wmpp66 with SMTP id p66so64801687wmp.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 07:11:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1449639461-9718-1-git-send-email-jijiang.liu@intel.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

2015-12-09 13:37, Jijiang Liu:
> The struct 'rte_eth_tunnel_flow' is only used by struct 'rte_eth_fdir_flow' now, but its name is generic,
> and I plan to extend new fileds like below to support generic configuration for tunneling packet.

You have not explained what the changes are for.
So it's really difficult to have an opinion.
Please describe an use case.

PS: "filed" -> "field"