From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] eal/common: introduce rte_memset on IA
	platform
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 16:09:39 +0100
Message-ID: <2141223.ggdlk6O12s@xps13>
References: <1480926387-63838-1-git-send-email-zhiyong.yang@intel.com>
 <7223515.9TZuZb6buy@xps13>
 <E182254E98A5DA4EB1E657AC7CB9BD2A3EB565EC@BGSMSX101.gar.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com, "Richardson,
 Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>, "Ananyev,
 Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>, "De Lara Guarch,
 Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
To: "Yang, Zhiyong" <zhiyong.yang@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com (mail-wm0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC57237A8
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu,  8 Dec 2016 16:09:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id t79so30036139wmt.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 07:09:41 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <E182254E98A5DA4EB1E657AC7CB9BD2A3EB565EC@BGSMSX101.gar.corp.intel.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

2016-12-08 07:41, Yang, Zhiyong:
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> > 2016-12-05 16:26, Zhiyong Yang:
> > > +#ifndef _RTE_MEMSET_X86_64_H_
> > 
> > Is this implementation specific to 64-bit?
> > 
> 
> Yes.

So should we rename this file?
rte_memset.h -> rte_memset_64.h

You need also to create a file rte_memset.h for each arch.