From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] lib/librte_flow_classify: remove table id parameter from apis Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:52:46 +0100 Message-ID: <2144605.X1J6VfJWv8@xps> References: <20171215103924.5185-1-jasvinder.singh@intel.com> <2932732.5Kg9JDsi0f@xps> <54CBAA185211B4429112C315DA58FF6D332C3E4B@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Iremonger, Bernard" , "Kovacevic, Marko" To: "Singh, Jasvinder" Return-path: Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0641B169 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:53:13 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <54CBAA185211B4429112C315DA58FF6D332C3E4B@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 10/01/2018 10:54, Singh, Jasvinder: > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net] > > 19/12/2017 15:29, Jasvinder Singh: > > > This patch removes table id parameter from all the flow classify apis > > > to reduce the complexity alongwith some code cleanup. > > > > > > The validate api is exposed as public api to allow user to validate > > > the flow before adding it to the classifier. > > > > This patch does not compile alone. > > Should we merge all patches together? > > No, It should compile alone. On my system it doesn't show any error and compilation goes successfully. Could you send me error log, etc ? test/test/test_flow_classify.c:48:10: fatal error: too many arguments to function call, expected 6, have 7 NULL, NULL); ^~~~ I guess it is expected that test and example does not compile after patch 1. That's why I suggest to merge all 4 patches.