From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mbuf: remove unused Rx error flags
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 15:52:33 +0200
Message-ID: <2148362.QAOR8LvMLg@xps13>
References: <57344C06.1030007@6wind.com> <575EABE5.6010807@6wind.com>
 <20160613132530.GC15736@bricha3-MOBL3>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>, "Ananyev,
 Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org,
 "johndale@cisco.com" <johndale@cisco.com>, "Zhang,
 Helin" <helin.zhang@intel.com>, "arnon@qwilt.com" <arnon@qwilt.com>,
 "rolette@infinite.io" <rolette@infinite.io>, "Chen,
 Jing D" <jing.d.chen@intel.com>, "Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com (mail-wm0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42A3A3978
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 15:52:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id k204so80792967wmk.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 06:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20160613132530.GC15736@bricha3-MOBL3>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

> > > Just a note, I think you'll need to rebase your patch with latest code.
> > > enic PMD fails to compile.
> > 
> > Indeed, this patch should be applied after John's enic series. Latest
> > one is there:
> > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-June/040183.html
> > 
> > Please Bruce/Thomas, check this dependency before applying.
> > 
> That patchset is already applied to next-net so this patch applies cleanly and
> compiles ok there.
> Thomas, you ok for me just to apply this patch to next-net also?

No problem