From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 4/4] vfio: do not needlessly check for IOVA mode Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2018 21:55:50 +0200 Message-ID: <2150891.lHFGnLmqhT@xps> References: <37c2e329be49799fae8328e4dd93e5c95da3d326.1522585461.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com> <1879734.oMB4ugugbB@xps> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com To: "Burakov, Anatoly" Return-path: Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB032B82 for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 21:56:09 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 02/04/2018 19:12, Burakov, Anatoly: > On 02-Apr-18 5:29 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 01/04/2018 14:26, Anatoly Burakov: > >> Cc: stable@dpdk.org > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov > > > > It deserves an explanation. > > > > Please Anatoly, think about commit explanations more often. > > > > I was under the impression that from context of previous patches, it > would be obvious? When we'll check this file in the git history, the context of previous patch won't be so useful. > But OK, i'll respin. Thanks, it's important to consider each patch individually.