From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [RFC] proposal of allowing personal/project repos on DPDK.org Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 09:21:34 +0200 Message-ID: <2183495.DK3t6yERKa@xps> References: <20170601050730.GA5765@debian-ZGViaWFuCg> <11265330.F2tAlQhP2k@xps> <20170620061618.GA14527@debian-ZGViaWFuCg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, techboard@dpdk.org To: Tiwei Bie Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170620061618.GA14527@debian-ZGViaWFuCg> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 20/06/2017 08:16, Tiwei Bie: > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 03:29:29PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > Hi, > > > > 01/06/2017 07:07, Tiwei Bie: > > > We'd like to make a proposal of making DPDK.org allow hosting > > > some personal/project repos, which could be very useful when > > > someone wants to try some experimental projects in DPDK. > > > > It has been discussed during the last technical board meeting. > > The board was not convinced by this idea, but would like to better > > understand what is the problem to be solved with this proposal? > > > > If there is something to solve, we could decide one these proposals: > > 1/ let users free to choose their forge > > 2/ advise for gitlab > > 3/ advise for github (and fight to recover the name DPDK) > > 4/ pay a sysadmin to host and secure our own forge in dpdk.org domain > > > > Anyway, I don't think it's a bad idea to get the name DPDK back > on github if possible. Any thoughts? I've already tried to get it two years ago. I will try again requesting help from the Linux Foundation.