From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/7] ixgbe:clean scattered_rx configure in dev_stop Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 11:32:31 +0100 Message-ID: <2198498.ADxB2GqUVu@xps13> References: <1414372809-14044-1-git-send-email-cunming.liang@intel.com> <2823765.s7EKI2PXYZ@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org To: "Liang, Cunming" Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" 2014-11-12 10:29, Liang, Cunming: > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon-pdR9zngts4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org] > > 2014-11-12 08:21, Liang, Cunming: > > > For em, igb and i40e, we haven't provide so much rx/tx pair for switching. > > > > Sorry, I don't understand. Which pair are you telling about? > > em, igb and i40e have scattered Rx functions. > > Maybe pair is not accurate, I means the different rx/tx register function, like: > Ixgbe_recv_bulk_alloc/ixgbe_recv_(scattered_)pkts_vec/ixgbe_recv_scattered_pkts > ixgbe_xmit_pkts_simple/Ixgbe_xmit_pkts_vec/ixgbe_xmit_pkts OK that's what I understood. However, you should check the scatter/non-scatter Rx functions of other drivers. I think they need the same fix. Thanks -- Thomas