From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] app/testpmd: do not enable Rx offloads by
	default
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 08:49:31 +0100
Message-ID: <22325029.7cdozGXWV9@xps>
References: <1516695081-178919-1-git-send-email-motih@mellanox.com>
 <20180125080141.0dd6ac91@xeon-e3>
 <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC09093B721CB9@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
 Moti Haimovsky <motih@mellanox.com>, dev@dpdk.org,
 "shahafs@mellanox.com" <shahafs@mellanox.com>, "Yigit,
 Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: "Lu, Wenzhuo" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16CE81B355
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 08:50:14 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC09093B721CB9@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

26/01/2018 08:31, Lu, Wenzhuo:
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen@networkplumber.org]
> > On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 10:04:11 +0100
> > Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
> > > 25/01/2018 02:11, Lu, Wenzhuo:
> > > > > --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> > > > > +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> > > > > @@ -305,9 +305,7 @@ struct fwd_engine * fwd_engines[] = {
> > > > >   */
> > > > >  struct rte_eth_rxmode rx_mode = {
> > > > >  	.max_rx_pkt_len = ETHER_MAX_LEN, /**< Default maximum frame
> > > > > length. */
> > > > > -	.offloads = (DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_FILTER |
> > > > > -		     DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_STRIP |
> > > > > -		     DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP),
> > > > > +	.offloads = 0,
> > > >
> > > > Change the default behavior may trigger other problems. I think TX
> > offload could be a good reference. Get the capability and check what's
> > supported first, then ignore the not supported functions with printing a
> > warning but not block anything...
> > >
> > > I agree that we should check the capabilities before requesting an offload.
> > > But I disagree on another point: we should not enable an offload if
> > > the user did not request it explicitly. It makes things unclear.
> > > This is a testing tool, it should be close to the ethdev API behavior.
> > >
> > > Why these offload flags are silently enabled?
> > 
> > Also all virtual devices ignore CRC strip.
> Look like it's the case the device ignores the flag if it doesn't have the capability.

It is a wrong behaviour!
If a configuration cannot be applied, it must be an error.