From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 8/9] virtio: add 1.0 support Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 09:11:07 +0100 Message-ID: <2261590.4JDQbYOqdP@xps13> References: <1452832571-6156-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> <4677246.JVjdGphvhY@xps13> <20160127034612.GE4257@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Yuanhan Liu Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com (mail-wm0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17B569436 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 09:12:17 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f48.google.com with SMTP id n5so13760495wmn.0 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 00:12:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20160127034612.GE4257@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-01-27 11:46, Yuanhan Liu: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:49:10PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 2016-01-19 16:12, Yuanhan Liu: > > > int > > > vtpci_init(struct rte_pci_device *dev, struct virtio_hw *hw) > > > { > > > - hw->vtpci_ops = &legacy_ops; > > > + hw->dev = dev; > > > + > > > + /* > > > + * Try if we can succeed reading virtio pci caps, which exists > > > + * only on modern pci device. If failed, we fallback to legacy > > > + * virtio handling. > > > + */ > > > + if (virtio_read_caps(dev, hw) == 0) { > > > + PMD_INIT_LOG(INFO, "modern virtio pci detected."); > > > + hw->vtpci_ops = &modern_ops; > > > + hw->modern = 1; > > > + dev->driver->drv_flags |= RTE_PCI_DRV_INTR_LSC; > > > + return 0; > > > + } > > > > RTE_PCI_DRV_INTR_LSC is already set by virtio_resource_init_by_uio(). > > We don't go that far here. Here we just detect if it's a modern virtio > device. And if yes, we do some modern initiations, and return. > > virtio_resource_init_by_uio() is invoked when virtio_read_caps() fails. > > > Do you mean interrupt was not supported with legacy virtio? > > Nope. this patch set changes nothing on legacy virtio support. Oh yes. I guess I had not seen the return.