From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/11] mk: add rte security into build system Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 22:48:37 +0200 Message-ID: <2265201.zheMNP9zCB@xps> References: <20171014221734.15511-1-akhil.goyal@nxp.com> <20171024141545.30837-1-akhil.goyal@nxp.com> <20171024141545.30837-9-akhil.goyal@nxp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, declan.doherty@intel.com, pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com, radu.nicolau@intel.com, borisp@mellanox.com, aviadye@mellanox.com, sandeep.malik@nxp.com, jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, john.mcnamara@intel.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, shahafs@mellanox.com, olivier.matz@6wind.com To: Akhil Goyal Return-path: Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF1B01B827 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 22:48:38 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20171024141545.30837-9-akhil.goyal@nxp.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Can you squash this patch with the one bringing the lib? > +DEPDIRS-librte_cryptodev += librte_ether I don't like this dependency. Why is it needed? > +DIRS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_SECURITY) += librte_security > +DEPDIRS-librte_security := librte_eal librte_mempool librte_ring librte_mbuf > +DEPDIRS-librte_security += librte_ether > +DEPDIRS-librte_security += librte_cryptodev