From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/25] Refactor mlx5 to improve performance Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 14:26:43 +0200 Message-ID: <2274344.6Ke4rvol7m@xps13> References: <1465379291-25310-1-git-send-email-nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com> <20160621074308.GL23111@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> <57691A87.4000200@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Yuanhan Liu , Nelio Laranjeiro , Tetsuya Mukawa To: Ferruh Yigit Return-path: Received: from mail-lf0-f47.google.com (mail-lf0-f47.google.com [209.85.215.47]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97219C346 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 14:26:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lf0-f47.google.com with SMTP id f6so21344108lfg.0 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 05:26:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <57691A87.4000200@intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-06-21 11:44, Ferruh Yigit: > Although this is really detail, for multi version patchsets, if there is > a preferred way between (A) or (B) I would like to learn too? In my opinion, A and B are fine. And I prefer B. > A) > > - [0/N] > - - [1/N] > - - [2/N] > - - [v2 0/N] > - - - [v2 1/N] > - - - [v2 N/N] > - - - [v3 0/N] > - - - - [v3 1/N] > - - - - [v3 N/N] > - - - - [v4 0/N] > - - - - - [v4 1/N] > - - - - - [v4 N/N] > > > > B) > > - [0/N] > - - [1/N] > - - [2/N] > - - [v2 0/N] > - - - [v2 1/N] > - - - [v2 N/N] > - - [v3 0/N] > - - - [v3 1/N] > - - - [v3 N/N] > - - [v4 0/N] > - - - [v4 1/N] > - - - [v4 N/N] > > > C) > > - [0/N] > - - [1/N] > - - [2/N] > - - [v2 0/N] > - - [v2 1/N] > - - [v2 N/N] > - - [v3 0/N] > - - [v3 1/N] > - - [v3 N/N]