From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/pcap: convert license headers to SPDX
	tags
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 22:35:15 +0100
Message-ID: <2307850.cGIK2K7be6@xps>
References: <20171218210616.37502-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
 <26b4b915-abf5-4eda-7187-827666f30167@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
 Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
 John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057021D7
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 22:35:18 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <26b4b915-abf5-4eda-7187-827666f30167@intel.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

18/12/2017 22:18, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 12/18/2017 1:06 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> 
> <...>
> 
> > + * SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> > + * Copyright(c) 2010-2016 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
> > + * Copyright(c) 2014 6WIND S.A.
> > + * All rights reserved.
> >   */
> 
> Hi Hemant, Thomas,
> 
> Can you please suggest about extra "All rights reserved." line.
> 
> It is in the part of the BSD header, and I _assume_ that has been intended to
> cover all "Copyright" lines above it.
> But since some of the Copyright holders (at least Intel ones) already has that
> in same line with copyright and I _assume_ this is intentional because of legal
> requirements, can we remove that line.
> 
> I guess we have two options while removing it, applying it to all previous
> Copyright lines (B) or just remove it (A):
> 
> (A)
>  SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
>  Copyright(c) 2010-2016 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
>  Copyright(c) 2014 6WIND S.A.
> 
> (B)
>  SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
>  Copyright(c) 2010-2016 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
>  Copyright(c) 2014 6WIND S.A. All rights reserved.
> 
> Can we go with option (A)?

I have absolutely no idea about "All rights reserved".
Please get some inputs from Intel lawyers.