From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] bond: free mbufs if transmission fails in bonding tx_burst functions Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:31:52 +0200 Message-ID: <2319059.S7dZfdPe5P@xps13> References: <1408456313-28812-1-git-send-email-declan.doherty@intel.com> <1409560289-29558-5-git-send-email-declan.doherty@intel.com> <345C63BAECC1AD42A2EC8C63AFFC3ADC2737656B@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org To: "Doherty, Declan" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <345C63BAECC1AD42A2EC8C63AFFC3ADC2737656B-kPTMFJFq+rF9qrmMLTLiibfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" Hi Declan, 2014-09-02 09:22, Doherty, Declan: > I've just noticed that I inserted an extra character into the patch when I was annotating this > patch which will cause this a fail compilation. > > > + TEST_BCAST_SLAVE_TX_FAIL_BURST_SIZE -s > > + TEST_BCAST_SLAVE_TX_FAIL_MIN_PACKETS_COUNT); > > should have been > > + TEST_BCAST_SLAVE_TX_FAIL_BURST_SIZE - > > + TEST_BCAST_SLAVE_TX_FAIL_MIN_PACKETS_COUNT); > > Thomas, do you want me to submit a V3 of this? I'd prefer to have some comments first. Anyone to review this patchset? -- Thomas