From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] relicense various bits of the dpdk Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 23:16:43 +0100 Message-ID: <2341877.B6D55p2t3H@xps> References: <20171204155557.31915-1-nhorman@tuxdriver.com> <20180201121911.28829-1-nhorman@tuxdriver.com> <74f19e7f-dc0f-ad3b-2a24-bb8260745a79@nxp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Hemant Agrawal To: Neil Horman Return-path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54A0C1B713 for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 23:16:48 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <74f19e7f-dc0f-ad3b-2a24-bb8260745a79@nxp.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 01/02/2018 13:49, Hemant Agrawal: > On 2/1/2018 5:49 PM, Neil Horman wrote: > > Received a note the other day from the Linux Foundation governance board > > for DPDK indicating that several files I have copyright on need to be > > relicensed to be compliant with the DPDK licensing guidelines. I have > > some concerns with some parts of the request, but am not opposed to > > other parts. So, for those pieces that we are in consensus on, I'm > > proposing that we change their license from BSD 2 clause to 3 clause. > > I'm also updating the files to use the SPDX licensing scheme > > > > Signed-off-by: Neil Horman > > CC: Hemant Agrawal > > CC: Thomas Monjalon > > Acked-by: Hemant Agrawal Applied, thanks