From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] service cores: cover letter Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2017 21:25:58 +0200 Message-ID: <2348349.WgB7oMYfnC@xps> References: <1499445667-32588-1-git-send-email-harry.van.haaren@intel.com> <1499782773-12277-1-git-send-email-harry.van.haaren@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, keith.wiles@intel.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com To: Harry van Haaren Return-path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF70523D for ; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 23:42:42 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <1499782773-12277-1-git-send-email-harry.van.haaren@intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Harry, I like the service concept! 11/07/2017 16:19, Harry van Haaren: > Harry van Haaren (7): > service cores: header and implementation > service cores: EAL init changes > service cores: coremask parsing > service cores: add unit tests > event/sw: enable SW PMD with service capability > doc: add service cores to doc and release notes > maintainers: claim service cores Titles are shorten to "service:" instead of "service cores". No need of specific patches for doc and maintainers. I've squashed them appropriately. The unit test file is also added in the maintainers section. Applied, thanks Next step: I think you should convert service coremask to a corelist option. We must stop using coremasks because they are limited.