From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: change rte_memcpy to inline function
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 17:49:53 +0200
Message-ID: <2364439.Jm7BSl6O9C@xps13>
References: <1462869064-9423-1-git-send-email-jianbo.liu@linaro.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com
To: Jianbo Liu <jianbo.liu@linaro.org>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com (mail-wm0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A45568DB1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 13 May 2016 17:49:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id g17so37086402wme.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 13 May 2016 08:49:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1462869064-9423-1-git-send-email-jianbo.liu@linaro.org>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

2016-05-10 14:01, Jianbo Liu:
> Other APP may call rte_memcpy by function pointer,
> so change it to an inline function.

Any example in mind?

> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/arm/rte_memcpy_64.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/arm/rte_memcpy_64.h
> -#define rte_memcpy(d, s, n)	memcpy((d), (s), (n))
> +static inline void *
> +rte_memcpy(void *dst, const void *src, size_t n)
> +{
> +	return memcpy(dst, src, n);
> +}

It has no sense if other archs (arm32, ppc64, tile) are not updated.