From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] common: add bsf64 function similar to existing bsf32 Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 10:08:00 +0100 Message-ID: <2404179.zdsFj4qAU7@xps> References: <1cf22c82b6ca7561966be674afb8a02add0913b9.1544550999.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, John McNamara , Marko Kovacevic , jasvinder.singh@intel.com, cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com, jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com To: Anatoly Burakov Return-path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6D81B3FC for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 10:08:03 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 11/12/2018 18:57, Anatoly Burakov: > Implement a new rte_bsf64 function that is following convention > set by existing rte_bsf32 function. Also, document the change in > release notes. > > Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov > --- > doc/guides/rel_notes/release_19_02.rst | 4 +++- > lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h | 19 ++++++++++++++++++- > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Could remove here the implementations in eal_memalloc.c and testpmd? You could also update the test in this patch.