From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH] test_mempool: remove unused mp_ext var Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 15:35:09 +0200 Message-ID: <24109515.NGORzl0sje@xps13> References: <1469101787-7186-1-git-send-email-santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com> <887a9e8d-b7cf-4148-d749-5019b206405e@6wind.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, David Hunt To: Olivier Matz , Santosh Shukla Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com (mail-wm0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C03B647CD for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 15:35:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f53.google.com with SMTP id o80so25604496wme.1 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 06:35:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <887a9e8d-b7cf-4148-d749-5019b206405e@6wind.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-07-21 15:28, Olivier Matz: > Hi Santosh, > > On 07/21/2016 01:49 PM, Santosh Shukla wrote: > > test_mempool func not using pointer variable 'mp_ext' and incorrectly freed. So > > removing ptr var. Now freeing mp_stack var. > > > > Signed-off-by: Santosh Shukla > > --- > > app/test/test_mempool.c | 3 +-- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/app/test/test_mempool.c b/app/test/test_mempool.c > > index 46ad670..3b21cf7 100644 > > --- a/app/test/test_mempool.c > > +++ b/app/test/test_mempool.c > > @@ -506,7 +506,6 @@ test_mempool(void) > > { > > struct rte_mempool *mp_cache = NULL; > > struct rte_mempool *mp_nocache = NULL; > > - struct rte_mempool *mp_ext = NULL; > > struct rte_mempool *mp_stack = NULL; > > > > rte_atomic32_init(&synchro); > > @@ -605,7 +604,7 @@ test_mempool(void) > > err: > > rte_mempool_free(mp_nocache); > > rte_mempool_free(mp_cache); > > - rte_mempool_free(mp_ext); > > + rte_mempool_free(mp_stack); > > return -1; > > } > > > > > > Strange, it seems these modifications were present in latest patch from > David Hunt (v6). Maybe a bad manipulation during the push? Yes sorry, it seems to be a wrong manipulation, the v5 was pushed. This patch seems to fix my error, thanks. > The "Fixes:" line should be added though. > > Acked-by: Olivier Matz