From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/10] qede: Enable PMD build Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 10:51:06 +0200 Message-ID: <2411922.nRbcghIYQB@xps13> References: <1459476927-21387-1-git-send-email-rasesh.mody@qlogic.com> <4202835.rtEgrshY1X@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Rasesh Mody , "bruce.richardson@intel.com" , dev@dpdk.org, "stephen@networkplumber.org" , Ameen Rahman , Sony Chacko To: Harish Patil Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89FCA2BE2 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 10:51:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id u206so69318309wme.1 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 01:51:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-04-20 00:14, Harish Patil: > >2016-03-31 19:15, Rasesh Mody: > >> --- a/config/common_base > >> +++ b/config/common_base > >> +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_QEDE_RX_COAL_US=3D24 > >> +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_QEDE_TX_COAL_US=3D48 > > > >It looks to be some tuning which could be done at runtime. Isn't it?= > =20 > That=E2=80=99s right. Can you please suggest if there is any better o= ption to make > it a runtime? There is no PMD API for that. There are some devargs for that. For PCI dev, it can be passed in the whitelist option. We should remove this limitation by having a devargs API (and command l= ine options) independent of whitelisting.