From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: Compiler for Windows Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2019 18:08:28 +0100 Message-ID: <24170945.hIekyy4cRm@xps> References: <7824863.MkUOD0j12R@xps> <20190107085125.3e3adf05@hermes.lan> <20190107170021.GB23828@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: Stephen Hemminger , "Burakov, Anatoly" , 'Jason Messer' , 'Harini Ramakrishnan' , 'Omar Cardona' , 'Ranjit Menon' , 'Mattias =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=F6nnblom=27?= , 'Jeff Shaw' , dev@dpdk.org To: Bruce Richardson Return-path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE731B273 for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 18:08:33 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20190107170021.GB23828@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 07/01/2019 18:00, Bruce Richardson: > I think for windows we probably want to start with the MS compiler first, > since from my understanding it's probably the default go-to compiler for > developers on windows, and look at alternatives from there. Not sure. I feel clang is a better option. This is the purpose of this thread: which compiler can work with the DPDK code base? Which modifications of code are acceptable? Unfortunately we lost my original attempt of getting some facts.