From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: update timestamp validity for latency measurement Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 01:37:39 +0100 Message-ID: <2473532.83oZ9KRiyE@xps> References: <1538655839-32339-1-git-send-email-reshma.pattan@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, longtb5@viettel.com.vn, john.mcnamara@intel.com To: Reshma Pattan Return-path: Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5AB991 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 01:37:41 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <1538655839-32339-1-git-send-email-reshma.pattan@intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 04/10/2018 14:23, Reshma Pattan: > Updated the doc on how packets are marked to identify > their timestamp as valid and considered for latency > measurement. > > Suggested-by: Bao-Long Tran > Signed-off-by: Reshma Pattan > --- > This change is relevant to the below patch and must be applied > after that. > http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/45328/ It's better to squash doc & code patches together, when possible. Applied, thanks