From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: document the new devargs syntax Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 19:12:54 +0100 Message-ID: <2483941.Hd2P4Cn0d2@xps> References: <1516114218-21501-1-git-send-email-yliu@fridaylinux.org> <3336592.DqqRBrUkFp@xps> <20180123173708.yj6fc2uibmjpxplh@bidouze.vm.6wind.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Yuanhan Liu , Ferruh Yigit , dev@dpdk.org To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ga=EBtan?= Rivet Return-path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F18941B29A for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 19:13:33 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20180123173708.yj6fc2uibmjpxplh@bidouze.vm.6wind.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 23/01/2018 18:37, Ga=EBtan Rivet: > So your proposition is more flexible, but I do not see how "driver" will > be used for matching. I guess I'll see. =46or now, I am not sure there are real examples of driver-specific properties to match. An example in my mind: Napatech can have ports with the same PCI address and they don't have any standard way of distinguishing them.