From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] vhost: eventfd_link refactoring Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 20:10:44 +0100 Message-ID: <24946363.JLdsG3cOT4@xps13> References: <1440787880-7079-1-git-send-email-pboldin@mirantis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit To: dev@dpdk.org, Pavel Boldin Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com (mail-wi0-f169.google.com [209.85.212.169]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE1858E6A for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 20:11:55 +0100 (CET) Received: by wijp11 with SMTP id p11so17391872wij.0 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 12:11:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2015-10-29 18:33, Xie, Huawei: > On 10/29/2015 2:34 AM, Pavel Boldin wrote: > > The patchset contains an attempt at the refactoring the `eventfd_link` > > kernel module that is used to steal an FD in DPDK. > > > > The first patch refactors old EVENTFD_COPY handler fixing the codepath > > and errors returned from the kernel space. This patch is retained > > for the backward compatibility. > > > > The next one introduces a new more clean implementation of the > > EVENTFD_COPY2 ioctl that allocates a new fd for the `struct file' > > being stolen. > > > > The last patch uses this new mechanism in the DPDK userspace. > Pavel: > Don't forget signoff and version change message next time. > Or if you have time today, could you send a new version? > > Acked-by: Huawei Xie Applied, thanks