From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] examples/l3fwd: merge l3fwd-acl code
	into l3fwd
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 18:10:30 +0100
Message-ID: <2510395.XNuST6rEQr@xps>
References: <1489008729-28784-2-git-send-email-rkerur@gmail.com>
 <1489179491-9401-1-git-send-email-rkerur@gmail.com>
 <26db3c19-9321-ebd0-c732-54a05ed15a54@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: Ravi Kerur <rkerur@gmail.com>, dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
 John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD89529D2
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 18:10:34 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <26db3c19-9321-ebd0-c732-54a05ed15a54@intel.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

23/01/2019 17:32, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 3/10/2017 8:58 PM, rkerur at gmail.com (Ravi Kerur) wrote:
> > This patchset merges l3fwd-acl and l3fwd code into common directory.
> > Adds config file read option to build LPM and EM tables.
> > 
> > Ravi Kerur (3):
> >   examples/l3fwd: merge l3fwd-acl code into l3fwd
> >   examples/l3fwd: add config file support for lpm
> >   examples/l3fwd: add config file support for exact
> 
> Hi Ravi,
> 
> These l3fwd patches are in patchwork for a long time, I am updating the patchset
> as rejected, if it is still relevant please send a new version on top of latest
> repo.
> 
> Sorry for any inconvenience caused.
> 
> For reference patches:
> https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/21696/
> https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/21695/
> https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/21697/
> 
> doc one:
> https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/24211/

This work was going in the right direction.

Konstantin, as the maintainer of the ACL library,
do you think it is worth to keep this example as standalone or merged?