From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH] test/eal_flags: Optimize memory flags test Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 19:07:28 +0200 Message-ID: <2533962.DYNjplGVFj@xps> References: <1517883698-12921-1-git-send-email-phil.yang@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, nd@arm.com, anatoly.burakov@intel.com, herbert.guan@arm.com To: Phil Yang Return-path: Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F548E69 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 19:07:30 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <1517883698-12921-1-git-send-email-phil.yang@arm.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi, Your patch has been forgotten for months. Do not hesitate to ping if no reply. I have a question below. 06/02/2018 03:21, Phil Yang: > --- a/test/test/test_eal_flags.c > +++ b/test/test/test_eal_flags.c > -#define SOCKET_MEM_STRLEN (RTE_MAX_NUMA_NODES * 10) > +#define SOCKET_MEM_STRLEN (RTE_MAX_NUMA_NODES * 20) Why the above change? > @@ -1138,10 +1138,11 @@ test_memory_flags(void) > - int i, num_sockets = get_number_of_sockets(); > + int i, num_sockets = RTE_MIN(get_number_of_sockets(), > + RTE_MAX_NUMA_NODES); > #endif > > - if (num_sockets <= 0 || num_sockets > RTE_MAX_NUMA_NODES) { > + if (num_sockets <= 0) { > printf("Error - cannot get number of sockets!\n"); > return -1; > } >