From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [memnic PATCH 13/16] pmd: rename doc when installing Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 11:29:40 +0100 Message-ID: <2538842.0sWbMQBLAx@xps13> References: <1391529271-24606-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> <1391529271-24606-14-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> <5333E2F3.6060503@6wind.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org To: Olivier MATZ Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5333E2F3.6060503-pdR9zngts4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" > > MEMNIC doc may be installed with other DPDK docs. > > So more descriptive naming is required. > > > > A rule is created in order to have the same rule style for lib and doc. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon > > [...] > > > +$(DESTDIR)$(docdir)/$(DOC) : $S/README.rst > > + install -D -m 644 $< $@ > > What about renaming README.rst in dpdk-memnic.rst in source ? I'm not convinced. README is a good name when looking in source tree. > The rest of the patch looks good to me. > > Reviewed-by: Olivier Matz Applied -- Thomas