From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2]:rte_timer:timer lag issue correction Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 12:06:17 +0200 Message-ID: <2540689.G69qNnUy5g@xps13> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: "Sanford, Robert" , dev@dpdk.org, "reshma.pattan@intel.com" To: Karmarkar Suyash Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEFC98D35 for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 12:06:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id p138so264093619wmb.1 for ; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 03:06:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > > For Periodic timers ,if the lag gets introduced, the current code > > added additional delay when the next peridoc timer was initialized > > by not taking into account the delay added, with this fix the code > > would start the next occurrence of timer keeping in account the > > lag added.Corrected the behavior. > > > > Fixes: 9b15ba89 ("timer: use a skip list") > > > > Karmarkar Suyash (1): > > Signed-off-by: Karmarkar Suyash > > Yes, this change makes sense. I ran timer tests and they passed. > > Acked-by: Robert Sanford Applied, thanks