From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Change rte_eal_vdev_init to update port_id
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2015 11:21:04 +0200
Message-ID: <2618969.8Z8RK36gE9@xps13>
References: <1438884241-15599-1-git-send-email-rkerur@gmail.com>
 <55C41735.1030405@igel.co.jp>
 <CAFb4SLDLin+h8u8d5VNHPgxv_vQQn_3sHk1+2HKkHcQeeG-njw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: Ravi Kerur <rkerur@gmail.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com (mail-wi0-f176.google.com
 [209.85.212.176]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B57B75A45
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sun,  9 Aug 2015 11:22:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wibhh20 with SMTP id hh20so114364797wib.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sun, 09 Aug 2015 02:22:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAFb4SLDLin+h8u8d5VNHPgxv_vQQn_3sHk1+2HKkHcQeeG-njw@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

2015-08-07 15:06, Ravi Kerur:
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 7:25 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa <mukawa@igel.co.jp> wrote:
> > On 2015/08/07 3:04, Ravi Kerur wrote:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > Could you please make sure API consistency?
> > Is it ok to add above functions to DPDK_2.1 even though we are in RC
> > phase, or need to add to DPDK_2.2?
> >
> Same question. If it's targeted for 2.2 then I will modify this.

Why should it be in 2.1?
Is there something I missed which makes it an important fix?
If no, please stop sending this kind of patch until the end of the 2.1 release.
Thanks