From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] ethdev: add access to eeprom
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 12:25:35 +0200
Message-ID: <2623487.7NZ038SaYX@xps>
References: <1521630379-9554-1-git-send-email-zijie.pan@6wind.com>
 <1524565044-8583-1-git-send-email-zijie.pan@6wind.com>
 <1524565044-8583-2-git-send-email-zijie.pan@6wind.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, remy.horton@intel.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com,
 john.mcnamara@intel.com, marko.kovacevic@intel.com
To: Zijie Pan <zijie.pan@6wind.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E58E5374
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 12:25:37 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <1524565044-8583-2-git-send-email-zijie.pan@6wind.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

24/04/2018 12:17, Zijie Pan:
> +/**
> + * Placeholder for accessing plugin module eeprom
> + */
> +struct rte_dev_module_info {
> +	uint32_t type; /**< Type of plugin module eeprom */
> +	uint32_t eeprom_len; /**< Length of plugin module eeprom */
> +};

I am not sure "plugin module" is descriptive enough.
And I think the structure name should be rte_eth_dev_module_info
to make clear that we are talking about NIC modules.
Any better idea?

> +
> +/* EEPROM Standards for plug in modules */
> +#define RTE_ETH_MODULE_SFF_8079             0x1
> +#define RTE_ETH_MODULE_SFF_8079_LEN         256
> +#define RTE_ETH_MODULE_SFF_8472             0x2
> +#define RTE_ETH_MODULE_SFF_8472_LEN         512
> +#define RTE_ETH_MODULE_SFF_8636             0x3
> +#define RTE_ETH_MODULE_SFF_8636_LEN         256
> +#define RTE_ETH_MODULE_SFF_8436             0x4
> +#define RTE_ETH_MODULE_SFF_8436_LEN         256

> --- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> @@ -3947,6 +3947,32 @@ int rte_eth_set_queue_rate_limit(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t queue_idx,
>  	return eth_err(port_id, (*dev->dev_ops->set_eeprom)(dev, info));
>  }
>  
> +int __rte_experimental
> +rte_eth_dev_get_module_info(uint16_t port_id,
> +			    struct rte_dev_module_info *modinfo)
> +{
> +	struct rte_eth_dev *dev;
> +
> +	RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, -ENODEV);
> +
> +	dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
> +	RTE_FUNC_PTR_OR_ERR_RET(*dev->dev_ops->get_module_info, -ENOTSUP);
> +	return (*dev->dev_ops->get_module_info)(dev, modinfo);
> +}
> +
> +int __rte_experimental
> +rte_eth_dev_get_module_eeprom(uint16_t port_id,
> +			      struct rte_dev_eeprom_info *info)
> +{
> +	struct rte_eth_dev *dev;
> +
> +	RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, -ENODEV);
> +
> +	dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
> +	RTE_FUNC_PTR_OR_ERR_RET(*dev->dev_ops->get_module_eeprom, -ENOTSUP);
> +	return (*dev->dev_ops->get_module_eeprom)(dev, info);
> +}
> +
>  int
>  rte_eth_dev_get_dcb_info(uint16_t port_id,

Please move this code after other EEPROM related functions.


> --- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev_version.map
> +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev_version.map
> @@ -229,5 +229,7 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
>  	rte_mtr_policer_actions_update;
>  	rte_mtr_stats_read;
>  	rte_mtr_stats_update;
> +	rte_eth_dev_get_module_info;
> +	rte_eth_dev_get_module_eeprom;

This must be inserted in alphabetical order.

Thanks