From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] examples/skeleton-cat: PQoS CAT and CDP, example of libpqos usage Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 17:03:23 +0100 Message-ID: <2637627.HOJADSlSRT@xps13> References: <1456499233-66251-1-git-send-email-wojciechx.andralojc@intel.com> <2207879.MgxKVmgPIQ@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Cornu, Marcel D" To: "Kantecki, Tomasz" Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com (mail-wm0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 392E22BCE for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 17:05:08 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id p65so23481400wmp.0 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 08:05:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-03-11 15:54, Kantecki, Tomasz: > > > +Basic Forwarding sample application is a simple *skeleton* example of > > > +a forwarding application. It has been extended to make use of CAT via > > > +extended command line options and linking against the libpqos library. > > > > The skeleton aims to show a minimal piece of code (but bigger than hello > > world). > > For any other usage, I think the "l2fwd" name is more appropriate. > > > > > +DIRS-y += skeleton-cat > > > > We have used skeleton app as basis for this sample code. It is just to keep it as simple as possible. > Wouldn't it be confusing if we use "l2fwd" name for skeleton app functionality? I'm not sure. We need more opinions.