From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] qos: use rte_zmalloc instead of memzone for allocation Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 19:30:29 +0100 Message-ID: <2639617.qyW1YAv5A8@xps13> References: <20140307181335.024904493@vyatta.com> <20140307181423.371047493@vyatta.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org, Stephen Hemminger To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140307181423.371047493-ZtmgI6mnKB3QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" 07/03/2014 10:13, Stephen Hemminger: > Memory zone's are inflexible and can not be destroyed. > The size is fixed when initially created therefor QoS parameters > could not be modified at run time, because table size for a subport > might change. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger This change would probably deserve a description of the use case. Please explain in the log and/or comments why you need to increase this size. -- Thomas