From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: DPDK Logo Release Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 10:50:25 +0200 Message-ID: <2640734.MRyCso8b9j@xps13> References: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA67425610@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> <00B2C372B6E6DA4FB04934511BF0564A3E9B86BC@FMSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: "St Leger, Jim" Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com [209.85.212.175]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C3C48E64 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 10:51:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: by wiclk2 with SMTP id lk2so24104739wic.0 for ; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 01:51:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <00B2C372B6E6DA4FB04934511BF0564A3E9B86BC@FMSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2015-10-01 15:28, St Leger, Jim: > When can we expect the main website (including home page http://dpdk.org/) to be updated? As there was no comment about the demo page, it is now applied to every pages. > Have we opened up the website to allow the community to edit it? (I think this has been discussed in the past...) Yes you're right, it has been discussed and planned. The git tree will be published. Should it include the server config parts? Should we open a new mailing-list to receive patches and discussions? > Who owns website changes today? As you know, it was created at 6WIND but there is no special reason to not allow others to contribute. The opening effort hasn't been done yet because there was no specific request until recently and the email box admin@dpdk.org (advertised in the "about" section) was almost empty. Glad to see people interested in improving such things :) Thanks Intel for the nice logo! Do you have some insights about its signification to share?