From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [RFC] examples: remove l3fwd-vf example Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:30:28 +0200 Message-ID: <2646739.fctqXc0xZm@xps13> References: <1436860647-5862-1-git-send-email-jingjing.wu@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: "Zhang, Helin" Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com (mail-wi0-f179.google.com [209.85.212.179]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6B423772 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:31:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: by wibud3 with SMTP id ud3so165371355wib.0 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 03:31:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2015-07-14 14:50, Zhang, Helin: > From: Wu, Jingjing > > Because VF multi-queues can be supported, l3fwd can run on vf. > > Suggest to remove the l3fwd-vf example. > Totally agree with this! > But we need the confirmation from validation guys of that l3fwd works > quite well on VF with all NICs (e.g. i350, 82599, x550, xl710, and fm10k). Helin, any new from validation?