From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] eal: rename IPC sync request to
 pending request
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 11:57:20 +0100
Message-ID: <26512ff4-e6d4-e0c7-8fc2-2b4519a83f68@intel.com>
References: <338e432277f98a206df87e7808ec799de28535ce.1521895541.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
 <2165690.q5cnMgZWhB@xps> <2dc81fb9-5926-f595-27fc-1eee07d6e21b@intel.com>
 <2360089.qufSKTD6lu@xps>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, jianfeng.tan@intel.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E1514C7C
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 12:57:23 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <2360089.qufSKTD6lu@xps>
Content-Language: en-US
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On 28-Mar-18 11:08 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 28/03/2018 11:15, Burakov, Anatoly:
>> On 27-Mar-18 5:27 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> 27/03/2018 15:59, Anatoly Burakov:
>>>> Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
>>>> Suggested-by: Jianfeng Tan <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
>>>> Acked-by: Jianfeng Tan <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
>>>
>>> You probably have a good explanation for this change.
>>> Please explain in the commit message.
>>>
>>> Generally speaking, every commits should have an explanation,
>>> it is a basic quality rule.
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>
>> This is just to reduce noise in the following patch.
> 
> No Anatoly, you should explain why a rename is needed.
> 

I know :) I'm going to be submitting a v7 with function renames anyway, 
so i'll fix this as well.

-- 
Thanks,
Anatoly