From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH] ixgbe/base: fix VF multi-queue failure Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 19:54:30 +0200 Message-ID: <2656437.D36Uy5eLlH@xps13> References: <1459305971-5480-1-git-send-email-wenzhuo.lu@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Wenzhuo Lu Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com (mail-wm0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F0832C46 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 19:56:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f53.google.com with SMTP id 191so98858029wmq.0 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:56:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1459305971-5480-1-git-send-email-wenzhuo.lu@intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-03-30 10:46, Wenzhuo Lu: > When starting testpmd with multiple queues on a ixgbe VF > port, it failed with this printing, "nb_rxq(4) is greater > than max_rx_queues(1)". > > The root cause is the VF doesn't get the right max rx queue > number from PF and it uses the default value 1. > VF max rx queue number is set by PF through mailbox messages. > The message for this setting only supports version 1.1. As > message version is updated to 1.2, VF cannot parse the rx queue > number setting message correctly. > > This patch raise a specific base code update for this issue. > > Fixes: 72dec9e37a84 ("ixgbe: support multicast promiscuous mode on VF") > Signed-off-by: Wenzhuo Lu Applied, thanks