From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] mempool: add stack mempool handler
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 10:18:08 +0200
Message-ID: <265bd16d-beb8-8c6d-fa9e-49ae02bcc4e0@6wind.com>
References: <1467309909-123881-1-git-send-email-david.hunt@intel.com>
 <1467359183-5948-1-git-send-email-david.hunt@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: viktorin@rehivetech.com, jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com,
 shreyansh.jain@nxp.com
To: David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476842BB5
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri,  1 Jul 2016 10:18:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id v199so16386115wmv.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 01:18:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1467359183-5948-1-git-send-email-david.hunt@intel.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi Dave,

On 07/01/2016 09:46 AM, David Hunt wrote:
> This patch set adds a lifo stack handler to the external mempool
> manager.
> 
> This patch utilises the mempool handler feature which allows the addition
> of new mempool handlers to DPDK.
> 
> v6 changes:
>   * removed unneeded mp_ext variable.
>   * added in a free for mp_stack after we're finished with it.
> 
> v5 changes:
>   * Added the extra parameter requred for the changed test_mempool_basic()
>     function for user defined caches.
> 
> v4 changes:
>   * Update the test to replace the custom handler test with the
>     stack handler test rather than just adding a stack handler test.
>     The custom handler code is very similar to the stack handler, so
>     there's no need to have both.
> 
> v3 changes:
>   * Updated based on the latest version (v15) of the Mempool Handler feature
> 
> v2 changes:
>   * updated based on mailing list feedback (Thanks Stephen)
>   * checkpatch fixes.
> 
> David Hunt (2)
>   mempool: add stack (lifo) mempool handler
>   test: migrate custom handler test to stack handler
> 


Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>

Thanks!