From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] eal / bonding pmd cleanup Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 14:12:40 +0200 Message-ID: <2664722.6NP5qZZqUi@xps13> References: <1409062338-26477-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@6wind.com> <20140922130426.GE25406@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org To: David Marchand Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140922130426.GE25406-B26myB8xz7F8NnZeBjwnZQMhkBWG/bsMQH7oEaQurus@public.gmane.org> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" > > >> This patchset reworks the bonding pmd so that we don't need to modify the > > >> eal > > >> for this pmd to work. > > >> > > >> Basically, the arguments parsed at bond_init are stored in the bond > > >> private > > >> structure to be used at dev_configure time. > > >> If no argument are present, we suppose that the bonding api has been > > >> called. > > >> > > > > > > I did not get any comment on these patches. > > > Anyone ? > > > > > > The idea here is to keep pmd stuff in the pmds and avoid polluting the eal. > > > > ping > > Sorry, it was on my todo list and it kept getting pushed back. I like the > change, its makes great sense and does proper isolation of the PMD. > > Acked-by: Neil Horman Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon Applied. Patches 2 and 3 were merged since 2 is a revert and 3 is a partial revert of the revert ;) This patchset prove that my initial request was not so complex :) (http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-June/003833.html) Thanks -- Thomas