From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/13] e1000: move pci device ids to driver
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 15:22:55 +0200
Message-ID: <2673573.FISG7g2D0G@xps13>
References: <1453120248-28274-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@6wind.com>
 <1618846.KqsSDf0vGG@xps13>
 <20160422121328.GA11395@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, David Marchand <david.marchand@6wind.com>,
 Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>, "Richardson,
 Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>, Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@redhat.com>,
 Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>,
 Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>, "Zhang, Helin" <helin.zhang@intel.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com (mail-wm0-f43.google.com [74.125.82.43])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 391852C15
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 15:23:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wm0-f43.google.com with SMTP id u206so26794228wme.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 06:23:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20160422121328.GA11395@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

2016-04-22 08:13, Neil Horman:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 02:41:38PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2016-04-21 08:08, Neil Horman:
> > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 09:27:18AM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> > > > I don't mind doing trivial changes, but I don't have time for more on
> > > > this series.
> > > > 
> > > Um, I'm not sure what to say here.  The whole point of review is to help improve
> > > the code.  If you don't have time to do anything non-trivial, Why are we
> > > reviewing it?
> > 
> > Neil, thanks for reviewing.
> > If David has no time to improve this series, maybe someone else can take over.
> > I don't see any problem to have several authors on the same series.
> 
> Fair point, and yes, I've not done anything toward this goal at all, so I
> admit some work is better than none.  We just can't allow lack of time to be a
> reason to do something halfway.

Yes we can have steps in patchwork.
But no, it won't be merged until it is complete.
Volunteers are welcome to follow-up on this series.
Thanks