From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] new headroom stats library and example application Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 11:00:29 +0100 Message-ID: <2688879.N37tiOTcLP@xps13> References: <1424191340-26451-1-git-send-email-pawelx.wodkowski@intel.com> <2047616.cJycthpmiM@xps13> <60ABE07DBB3A454EB7FAD707B4BB1582138EBD9C@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org To: "Jastrzebski, MichalX K" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <60ABE07DBB3A454EB7FAD707B4BB1582138EBD9C-kPTMFJFq+rHjxeytcECX8bfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" 2015-02-24 09:49, Jastrzebski, MichalX K: > > > > I also feel that the name of this library is a bit too vague. Some people > > > > were asking first what means "headroom". It's actually for CPU headroom > > > > monitoring. > > > > What about "cpuheadroom", "cpuheadroomstat", "jobstat"? > > > > > > I think we can change the name to "cpuheadroom" as it describes more > > clear this library. > > > > If you're focusing on CPU usage with possible actions, yes. > > If you're focusing on decision helper, jobstat would be better IMHO. > > We will change the name to "jobstats". OK, I don't want to impose any name, it should be your choice. I guess you did an internal survey? Would you able to send a v6 today?