From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] vfio: Support for no-IOMMU mode Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 14:58:58 +0100 Message-ID: <26948068.xeVA9KiJZ0@xps13> References: <1453913438-22991-1-git-send-email-anatoly.burakov@intel.com> <1453982274-16717-1-git-send-email-anatoly.burakov@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Anatoly Burakov Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com (mail-wm0-f51.google.com [74.125.82.51]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C94C476 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 15:00:09 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f51.google.com with SMTP id l66so26565315wml.0 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 06:00:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1453982274-16717-1-git-send-email-anatoly.burakov@intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-01-28 11:57, Anatoly Burakov: > +#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(4, 5, 0) Why not #ifndef VFIO_NOIOMMU_IOMMU? It would avoid some backport issue. > +#define RTE_VFIO_NOIOMMU 8 > +#else > +#define RTE_VFIO_NOIOMMU VFIO_NOIOMMU_IOMMU > +#endif