From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/9] eal: move librte_malloc to eal/common
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 14:14:01 +0200
Message-ID: <2707498.ThPVHMap7h@xps13>
References: <1433586732-28217-1-git-send-email-sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
 <1435332578-28415-1-git-send-email-sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
 <1435332578-28415-2-git-send-email-sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (mail-wi0-f170.google.com
 [209.85.212.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F6C11C5
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu,  2 Jul 2015 14:15:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by widjy10 with SMTP id jy10so83180153wid.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 05:15:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1435332578-28415-2-git-send-email-sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

2015-06-26 16:29, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy:
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ F: lib/librte_eal/common/*
>  F: lib/librte_eal/common/include/*
>  F: lib/librte_eal/common/include/generic/
>  F: doc/guides/prog_guide/env_abstraction_layer.rst
> +F: doc/guides/prog_guide/malloc_lib.rst
>  F: app/test/test_alarm.c
>  F: app/test/test_atomic.c
>  F: app/test/test_byteorder.c
> @@ -97,6 +98,8 @@ F: app/test/test_spinlock.c
>  F: app/test/test_string_fns.c
>  F: app/test/test_tailq.c
>  F: app/test/test_version.c
> +F: app/test/test_malloc.c
> +F: app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c

I think we should keep a separate maintainer section for memory allocator
in EAL. I suggest this:

Memory allocation
M: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
F: lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_mem*
F: lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_malloc.h
F: lib/librte_eal/common/*malloc*
F: lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_mem*
F: lib/librte_eal/common/eal_hugepages.h
F: doc/guides/prog_guide/malloc_lib.rst
F: app/test/test_malloc.c
F: app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c

>  Secondary process
>  K: RTE_PROC_
> @@ -155,12 +158,6 @@ F: lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/
>  Core Libraries
>  --------------
>  
> -Dynamic memory
> -F: lib/librte_malloc/
> -F: doc/guides/prog_guide/malloc_lib.rst
> -F: app/test/test_malloc.c
> -F: app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c
> -
>  Memory pool