From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/11] Add installation rules for dpdk files. Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 20:17:20 +0100 Message-ID: <2719219.0ADflfCWst@xps13> References: <1442608390-12537-1-git-send-email-mario.alfredo.c.arevalo@intel.com> <1448931205-17357-1-git-send-email-mario.alfredo.c.arevalo@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, jos.c.venegas.munoz@intel.com To: Mario Carrillo Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com (mail-wm0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 021D6E62 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 20:18:31 +0100 (CET) Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so27958583wme.1 for ; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 11:18:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1448931205-17357-1-git-send-email-mario.alfredo.c.arevalo@intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Mario, Thanks for your work. There are some interesting ideas :) I'm going to send a patchset to establish the same kind of rules keeping the old install behaviour and allowing a standard one with the same name (install). The result would be closed to what pkg/dpdk.spec provides. Your review would be appreciated.