From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: Project move under DPDK.org umbrella. Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:12:28 +0200 Message-ID: <2749701.NIVXY2Dhhr@xps> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "O'Driscoll, Tim" , "Wiles, Keith" To: "Melik-Adamyan, Areg" Return-path: Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0E302C00 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:12:29 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi, 22/06/2017 23:58, Melik-Adamyan, Areg: > Per our discussion within Intel, I am sending official request to DPDK community to include our cloud network function framework YANFF - https://www.github.com/intel-go/yanff to DPDK.org. As it is using DPDK underneath and provides higher level abstraction for enabling development of cloud network function in a native way, we hope that it will be good addition in enhancing DPDK community. > Please let me know what are the steps and from our side I am ready to provide more detailed information. It's good to see more and more projects using DPDK. I think you should write a page in your project to explain what benefit it brings to the application developper, compared to directly using DPDK. >>From what I read, I keep the words "framework" and "higher level" which are not so informative in my opinion :) About requesting an integration in dpdk.org, it must be approved by the Technical Board and the Governing Board, as described in the charter: http://dpdk.org/about/charter Anyway, it should be added in this page: http://dpdk.org/about/ecosystem