From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] unify tools naming
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 10:04:13 +0200
Message-ID: <2761669.Unk5LuuApo@xps13>
References: <1469024670-4638-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
 <20160722014657.GM28708@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
To: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-lf0-f46.google.com (mail-lf0-f46.google.com
 [209.85.215.46]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 984C53989
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 10:04:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-lf0-f46.google.com with SMTP id l69so79359514lfg.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 01:04:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20160722014657.GM28708@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

2016-07-22 09:46, Yuanhan Liu:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 04:24:30PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > The following tools may be installed system-wise.
> 
> Yes, indeed. Following is an example from dpdk package shipped in
> ubutun 16.04:
> 
>     dpdk: /etc/dpdk/dpdk.conf
>     dpdk: /etc/dpdk/interfaces
>     dpdk: /etc/init.d/dpdk
>     dpdk: /lib/dpdk/dpdk-init
>     dpdk: /lib/systemd/system/dpdk.service
>     dpdk: /sbin/dpdk_nic_bind
>     dpdk: /usr/bin/dpdk_proc_info
>     dpdk: /usr/bin/testpmd
>     dpdk: /usr/share/doc/dpdk/changelog.Debian.gz
>     dpdk: /usr/share/doc/dpdk/copyright
>     dpdk: /usr/share/dpdk/tools/cpu_layout.py
>     dpdk: /usr/share/dpdk/tools/dpdk_nic_bind.py
>     dpdk: /usr/share/dpdk/tools/setup.sh
> 
> > It may be cleaner and more convenient to find them with the same
> > dpdk- prefix (especially for autocompletion).
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> > Moreover, the script dpdk_nic_bind.py deserves a new name because it is
> > not restricted to NICs and can be used for e.g. crypto.
> 
> Second that. But we might need doc the name change to let user aware of
> that.

There is a note in API changes section.
And every references in the doc are renamed.

> > These files are renamed:
> > pmdinfogen       -> dpdk-pmdinfogen
> > pmdinfo.py       -> dpdk-pmdinfo.py
> > dpdk_pdump       -> dpdk-pdump
> > dpdk_proc_info   -> dpdk-procinfo
> > dpdk_nic_bind.py -> dpdk-devbind.py
> > setup.sh         -> dpdk-setup.sh
> > 
> > The tools pmdinfogen, pmdinfo.py and dpdk_pdump are new in 16.07.
> > 
> > The scripts dpdk_nic_bind.py and setup.sh may have been used with
> > previous releases by end users. That's why a symbolic link still
> > provide the old name in the installed tools directory.
> 
> I was about suggesting the same thing: yes, we should keep the
> backward compatibility.

Does it mean you ack this patch?