From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] virtio ring layout optimization and simple rx/tx processing Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 10:08:59 +0100 Message-ID: <2781285.NC0gOiWCHN@xps13> References: <1443537953-23917-1-git-send-email-huawei.xie@intel.com> <82F45D86ADE5454A95A89742C8D1410E031866E2@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: "Xie, Huawei" Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com (mail-wm0-f51.google.com [74.125.82.51]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91913DE3 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 10:10:16 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f51.google.com with SMTP id p187so11570400wmp.0 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 01:10:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2015-12-17 05:22, Xie, Huawei: > You ever asked about the performance data. > Another thing is how about adding a simple vhost performance example, > like the vring bench which is used to test virtio performance, so that > each time we have some performance related patches, we could use this > benchmark to report the performance difference? The examples are part of the doc and should be enough simple to be used in a tutorial. The tool to test the DPDK drivers is testpmd. There is also the simpler unit tests in app/test. If something more complex is needed (with qemu options automated), maybe that dts is a better choice.