From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] moving away from coremask to corelist Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 09:46:35 +0100 Message-ID: <2782356.hAb1fhpyXq@xps13> References: <20170209181450.58466-1-keith.wiles@intel.com> <20170209234233.63333-1-keith.wiles@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, iryzhov@nfware.com To: Keith Wiles Return-path: Received: from mail-wr0-f172.google.com (mail-wr0-f172.google.com [209.85.128.172]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 824C6201 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 09:46:36 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr0-f172.google.com with SMTP id i10so102488997wrb.0 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:46:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20170209234233.63333-1-keith.wiles@intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Keith, 2017-02-09 17:42, Keith Wiles: > The coremask option in DPDK is difficult to use and we should be > promoting the use of the corelist (-l) option. The patch series > adjusts the docs to use -l EAL option instead of the -c option. > > The patch series doc change only and is not required to be done > in 17.02 release, but should be added to the 17.05 release. > The -c option will be kept and not removed for now unless in the > future we decide to deprecate the code. > > v2 - Fix taskset back to using -c > > Keith Wiles (11): > doc/cryptodev: use corelist instead of coremask > doc/faq: use corelist instead of coremask > doc/freebsd: use corelist instead of coremask > doc/howto: use corelist instead of coremask > doc/linux: use corelist instead of coremask > doc/nics: use corelist instead of coremask > doc/prog_guide: use corelist instead of coremask > doc/testpmd: use corelist instead of coremask > doc/cryptoperf: use corelist instead of coremask > doc/xen: use corelist instead of coremask > doc/sample_app: use corelist instead of coremask In case you make new revisions, I think you can squash every patches in a single one. They are all doing the same thing in different files.