From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/8] add sample ptp slave application Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 17:28:52 +0100 Message-ID: <2862850.gOUeStJOPQ@xps13> References: <1447332938-201120-1-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> <1447430954-94167-1-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, konstatin.ananyev@intel.com To: Pablo de Lara Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com (mail-wm0-f43.google.com [74.125.82.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D342C95C5 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 17:30:06 +0100 (CET) Received: by wmww144 with SMTP id w144so37961859wmw.0 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 08:30:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1447430954-94167-1-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2015-11-13 16:09, Pablo de Lara: > V6->v7: > - Simplified common functionality for timecounters and make it more generic. So you chose to drop the read() callback? I think it's better. What was the benefit of having it?