From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH] rte_eal: clarify the argc and argv documentation Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:24:19 +0100 Message-ID: <2903601.nWQBOfSRqE@xps13> References: <1481212605-3857-1-git-send-email-aconole@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Aaron Conole Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com (mail-wm0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D35D10BE3 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:24:20 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f42.google.com with SMTP id u144so41148342wmu.1 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 06:24:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1481212605-3857-1-git-send-email-aconole@redhat.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-12-08 10:56, Aaron Conole: > It's been a source of confusion in the past, and even with this update > may continue to be a source of confusion. However, the original > language seems to imply that the DPDK EAL will take ownership of the > array passed in. Loosening the language up a bit might give a better > understanding for what is actually happening. > > Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole Applied, thanks