From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3] mem: Fix anonymous mapping on Power9. Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 16:46:38 +0100 Message-ID: <2948898.EADOih85qf@xps> References: <20181116173538.5321-1-dwilder@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com To: David Wilder Return-path: Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A4A75592 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 16:46:41 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20181116173538.5321-1-dwilder@us.ibm.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi, Long time no talk about the IBM Power support status. 16/11/2018 18:35, David Wilder: > --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_18_11.rst > +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_18_11.rst > +* IBM Power8 is not supported by this release of DPDK. IBM Power9 is supported. The config file is defconfig_ppc_64-power8-linuxapp-gcc. Given that only Power9 is supported, should we rename it? Is there more changes required to make Power9 working with the latest DPDK?